Scorecard for our school’s food supply

Notice where Iowa is here.  I don’t know about you all, but I’d gladly pay more in taxes to have better food for my kids.  My little guy takes his lunch, but there is no reason that schools can’t be a sanctuary for children to eat healthy food.  Especially those that don’t get it at home.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest says you should be worried about the food your child is eating at school. Very worried.The CSPI recently gave 20 of the nation’s 50 states a big fat “F” for food nutrition policies that either fall way short of what’s needed or don’t exist at all.
Only two states–Kentucky and Oregon–earned the best grade giving by CSPI: an “A-.”

Meanwhile, only 2 percent of all children eat a healthy diet and obesity rates have tripled in the last 20 years. Still, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds that sugary drinks, snack cakes, candy and chips continue to be sold at about one-third of the country’s elementary schools, 71 percent of middle schools and 89 percent of high schools.

“Over the last ten years, states have been strengthening their school nutrition policies,” said Margo G. Wootan, the CSPI’s director of nutrition policy. “But overall, the changes, while positive, are fragmented, incremental, and not happening quickly enough to reach all children in a timely way.”
“You would think that with all the concern about childhood obesity that getting junk food and soda out of schools would be easy,” said Mary Lou Hennrich, who led the effort to improve nutrition in Oregon schools. “But, it took us six years of hard work to pass our school nutrition legislation.”
Hennrich is executive director of the Community Health Partnership: Oregon’s Public Health Institute.

The CSPI report card graded states as follows: A-minus (Kentucky, Oregon), B-plus (Nevada, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Washington, New Mexico), B (New Jersey, Arizona, Tennessee), B-minus (Louisiana, Texas, West Virginia, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Florida), C-plus (Hawaii), C (Maine, Mississippi, Illinois, District of Columbia), C-minus (Colorado, South Carolina), D-plus (New York, Maryland, North Carolina), D (Oklahoma, Virginia), D-minus (Indiana, Georgia), F (Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, Wyoming).

Advertisements

4 responses to “Scorecard for our school’s food supply

  1. The other side of the equation is activity. Kids are too molly-coddled these days and miss out on the chance to waste a lot of their energy just doing kid-stuff.

  2. Agreed. More recess and PE are needed. At my son’s school they get 20 minutes to eat, including time they spend in line for milk or their lunch. Not nearly enough for talkative 5 year olds.

  3. I agree, more recess and PE are needed at schools. As for the time, that is downright stupid to expect any child to eat in 20 minutes. It is hard enough for an adult(that is what I have) and you have to inhale which is also a contributing factor to the obesity problem.

    Cannot let this pass!!! Did you take note as to where ARKANSAS was on the grading pole???

  4. When I go eat lunch with my kids at school I can barely scarf the food down in the allotted time! I agree they don’t get enough time to eat. Same for recess. And they wonder why my kindergarten son gets restless? I’m sure they get less recess time than we did.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s